װעלן

I wonder if there is an error in the entry for 'veln zikh': the second person plural (vilt) is used in two places where the subject is 'es'. Shouldn't it be 'vil'?

Dovid

Comments

I checked Weinreich's dictionary and see that he, too, uses 'vilt'. So I am certainly wrong -- but don't understand why.

Dovid

[error by author]